Pardon the unintentional rhyme, but Chicago is under attack by packs of wild Blacks. (That’s “groups of people who are (a) wild and (b) Black.” Go ahead, tell me it’s not an accurate description.) Paul Kersey is all over this. They’re storming buses 15 at a time, beating White people with bottles and robbing them (NBC Chicago, June 8). Gangs of 15 or 20 are ambushing White pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as one visiting Japanese oncologist (CBS Chicago, June 5 and June 6; Chicago Tribune, June 6). Smaller groups are using pepper spray to disable their victims (CBS Chicago, June 3 and June 5). Contrary to media reports, the problem isn’t “teens” or “youths” or “kids” or “people.”
The problem is Black people.
These thugs are the problem. Concealed carry might be the solution.
Until recently, the hopelessly biased mainstream media were content merely to ignore, suppress, censor the race — not races — of these savages. (That’s “people who are savage.”) But censorship wasn’t enough. It couldn’t stop readers from seeing the photos. It couldn’t stop them from watching the videos. It couldn’t stop them from looking out their windows at the dark-skinned mobs rampaging outside. And it couldn’t stop the White victims from telling everyone they knew.
So the readers noticed, and pretty soon they cracked the secret code: if a story omits the race of the perpetrators, it’s not because the reporter doesn’t know what race they were. It’s because they were all Black.
That’s when readers started to complain. Oh, those complainers. I guess they don’t enjoy being beaten with bottles and baseballs — and fists and feet, of course — or sprayed with mace, then robbed of the things they bought with the money they earned working jobs — yes, jobs, something many Blacks just can’t be bothered with anymore. Stampeding over welfare application forms? Sure. But jobs? Not so much.
The Chicago Tribune reacted to the complaints of their customers in a way that shouldn’t be surprising to Park readers: they denounced — no, not the Black thugs, of course not — their own readers, for being so darn raciss. Yes, if you notice the race of a criminal, and that race happens to be Black (which it frequently is), then you are a racist — doubly so if you write in to ask why Tribune staff don’t notice it themselves.
There will be no five-month anniversary spectacular for Unamusement Park. It is canceled on account of Black savages (that’s “people who are (a) Black and (b) savage”) destroying our cities. Sorry, maybe next month. Instead, please enjoy a short series on the savages’ apologists (not to say accomplices) at the Chicago Tribune, winner of Unamusement Park’s first annual Most White-Hating Newspaper Award. I’m going to cover the following dishonest, despicable stories:
- “When race is relevant in news coverage” (June 10), by Gerould W. Kern, Editor
- “When a news story omits race, do we really know any less?” (June 8), by Mary Schmich
- “Mob attacks: Fear, too, is often skin deep” (June 8), by Dawn Turner Trice
- “Race and the ‘flash mob’ attacks” (June 8), by Steve Chapman
Please enjoy.
No, scratch that. Please get mad as hell.
Unamusement Park 
Getting mad as hell and calling blacks animals on an anonymous blog leaves us somewhere short of a solution.
[U: I assume you have a foolproof plan for solving the problem of Black dysfunction? I’d love to hear it.]
Anticipating an incredulous rebuttal…
I’ve contributed to several of the outlets to which you link. I’ve gotten to know the realist, non-neocon Right subculture.
It consists of people who run their mouths (with more or less truth) on computers and from hotel conference rooms, mostly to people who already share their attitudes.
So there’s little evidence of individuals who can carry themselves in the street and lead actual flesh-in-blood people, other than to say, “Did you pre-register for this conference?”
Not cutting it.
[U: If that’s what you believe, then you don’t really know the realist Right subculture. The men and women you’re looking for are out there.]
there is a lot, a LOT, of circle jerking in the reactionary right internet subculture, but what really are the alternatives Evan?
doing much more than that isn’t going to be very productive in the current environment. running for office or protesting is going to be obviously useless right now, and trying to lobby representatives already in place is going to be useless as the accusation of racism still has a lot of weight (though that seems to be decreasing rapidly). being seen to do anything overt to aid european-americans is going to be impossible for representatives who want to keep their jobs.
honestly, the best thing that people on the alt-right can do right now is wage an information war, getting ‘hate facts’ into circulation and showing people how dishonest and deliberately deceitful the main stream media is when reporting these matters. a broad base of support has to be built up before concrete action can be taken, and that concrete action is usually spurred on by outside events (like say, an economic collapse or a particularly egregious court ruling).
complaining that these people aren’t doing anything constructive or leading when what they are doing is likely the most effective thing for long term success and when you yourself aren’t doing anything is laughable.
@CLAR
Don’t tell me to get in the street and get mad unless you’re in the street and mad.
Arm yourself and take your lumps every day in an MMA school somewhere, preferably a mixed race one, so you’re accustomed to the dynamic.
The only people speaking should be BMAFs who are out there rolling heads. If that means you have to risk cycling through the prison system, it is what it is.
Oh, you wanted your renewal and restoration on the cheap? That’s fine — all you need is a sock or some toilet paper to clean up your mess when you’re done.
what the fuck? my whole point was that such a strategy would not be beneficial right now. i am not sure what to say if you can’t grasp that.
the type of change that is needed will not come from instigating violence from our ends, particularly isolated, individual, terrorist violence. such a strategy would be incredibly counterproductive.
plus, the people who are actively hurting us on the strategic scale aren’t even the NAMs, it is the DWLs.
that or incredibly stupid
i honestly don’t think there needs to be an ‘overthrow’. the tide is slowly turning as more people wake up, and the boomer generation ages and dies. hell, economic realities will do more than anything any kind of insurrection would be able to accomplish.
No, I simply won’t listen to someone whom I suspect is capable only of running his mouth, and can’t carry himself in a fight. It’s the only reliable test of character I’ve encountered. Our leadership can adopt whatever strategy it likes but it needs to be an authentic leadership, consisting of men with chests who know actual tests of brutality and hardship.
[U: Now you’re just being ridiculous. A good leader isn’t the same as a good street fighter.]
In other words, you’ve missed the point.
It’s a little frustrating that I remark that I’ve moved in all of these alt-right circles, that I got to know many of their personalities and observed their habits, and that based on that experience I thought their overall profile lacked toughness and real character,
and commenters come back with
Yeah, keep commenting guys.
[U: I don’t buy it. As someone who has actually moved in some of these alt-right circles, I say you haven’t. You might have stuck your head in, sneered at anyone who’s reading or writing or thinking about these issues instead of punching out random minorities on the street or throwing Molotov cocktails…]
my priorities don’t include impressing people over the internet. i’d much sooner take the pussy route that has a higher probability of long term success. best of luck to you though.
Evan
Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.
Evan,
I hear what you are saying and I’m sorry I don’t believe it. I’m a martial arts instructor even have competed in full contact for much of my career what good does beating up one or two thugs? What if I can change peoples minds? Find out how they think? I have spoken to more than a few people about the decline of the West, the emasculation of the European male, and the destruction of our institutions and I will have touched far more people than if I went out looking for trouble.
You see these animals are looking for easy targets I’m a pretty big guy with cauliflower ears and a thick neck not a good victim. No matter how much training handicapped people, the elderly, or those of small stature and weak constitutions have will they prevail in physical confrontations. But if I get them to hear and to see the truth of what is going on around us they will tell others and then they will tell others. Soon we will not seem so alone and a fringe element.
Maybe you need to read a little less “Got Fight.” and read a little more Sun Tzu? Once enough hearts and minds are on our side then if something drastic needs to be done we can do it before then I prefer to go home to my wife and home.
[U: This right here is what I like to call a “credible source.”]
I believe William Shakespeare said it best, “She doth protest too much!”
Read the comments of those papers if they are enabled and you will hear a lot of people who sound just like us. The Left and its scribes can try to spin this anyway they want but thanks to the internet and peoples own two eyes the reality is apparent. Things are reaching a head.
The pharmacist who was convicted was just a shot over the bow others will fight back and they too will be hung by racist Left leaning juries. This will happen until people say “Enough!” then and only then will the change take place.
It always gets worse before it gets better. The more these sub-humans act out the faster they dig their won graves.
BMAF = British Martial Arts Federation
Both Male And Female
Book of Mormon Archaeological Forum
I give up.
^^This is my favorite argument tactic. I use it when I know the other person just doesn’t agree with what I’ve said, but I want to try to convince any other people watching or listening that that person is stupid. Clearly, this makes me a world-class debater.
Every time I read this post title, I read it as “Chicago Under Attack by Packs of Wild Bears.” EVERY. TIME.
[U: I wish! Bears, we could handle.]
Those articles are all shit. The comments, however…
Frankly, I disagree with everyone on this.
These message boards are nothing more than harmless outlet for frustration by those of us attuned to the demographic crisis. We are convincing nobody but ourselves. The public service is perhaps the hyper-frustrated nutjob will vent his rage here rather than on the street where it would be extraordinarily counter-productive.
DWL’s won’t be swayed by logic. They may not be swayed by a gang of negroes raping their wives or daughters so pretending this blog or all the blogs on the topic will do the trick is just delusional.
What MAY awaken the sleeping masses into open and unapologetic outrage (including voting in the booth, self-defense in the public square, and broadcast castigation of the DWL apologists) is “austerity” and the necessary consequence of large scale (think LA riot large) negro criminality in every metropolis where there is significant state-dependent negro population. When not one but twenty major cities burn an the national guard must be supplemented by active duty troops with Apache helicopters cruising the urban skyline it will be impossible to ignore.
Blogs? Like I wrote, they serve a purpose, but let’s not be delusional about what the purpose is. Let’s leave delusion to the DWL’s.
this has a high chance of being the spark that starts the fire. do some reading about the financial shithole birmingham, AL is right now — it might start there, and within the next year.
@ Stan Mute (and Evan):
You’re mistaken. Start a blog — a good one — and see for yourself.
I’m reaching people and changing their minds. I know this because they tell me so. Then they go out and tell other people: friends, family, teachers, strangers.
Of course, there’s more you can do. Consult the links in the sidebar, under “Organizations.” If you’re a college student, make sure to join Youth for Western Civilization. They’re great.
The one thing you shouldn’t do is waste your time telling me that street fighting is part of the solution (it’s not), that I’m delusional (I’m not), that I’m not convincing anyone (I am), or that people won’t be swayed by anything short of twenty major American cities burning (they will).
Consider the “debate” on the usefulness of informing people closed.
What the f*** is wrong with you? I didn’t say street fighting was part of the solution. I said that we needed people who appear as if they can do more than talk and who know how to carry themselves. But that doesn’t matter. Great moderation here, guy.
This particular debate is (still) closed, and further comments are (still) considered off-topic. To avoid this in the future, when telling us we’re wasting our time and can’t do anything but talk, be more constructive, as in this example: “I think we could achieve greater success if we recruited more people who know how to carry themselves. In my experience…” And so on.
Also, if you’re going to use your personal experiences as evidence, explain what your experiences were.
“What the f*** is wrong with you? I didn’t say street fighting was part of the solution. I said that we needed people who appear as if they can do more than talk and who know how to carry themselves. But that doesn’t matter. Great moderation here, guy.”
Translation into modern English:
“Wah wah wah wah wah wah wah (thumb sucking) wah wah wah wah wah”
Unamused, keep informing even when I disagree with you.
And post pics of Nordic girls.
Right, you nailed it.
I’ll just put this thought here even though the conversation is “a waste of time” or whatever. Here’s the problem.
As far as you go, Unamused — anonymous college-looking kid — you’re right. Congratulations. You’re doing a great job, getting out there and savaging the haters and hypocrites.
What you’re building is a script with which to discuss the issues at hand. And it’s a pretty good script. I like the flyers on race and crime, for example, and pretty much everything you’ve written.
Now, I know I have to keep in mind everyone’s delicate sensibilities here, and stay on topic, and politely frame things in terms of my experiences. [Deleted.] Just think it through. What kind of attention would someone be attracting in his or her day-to-day life if he started posting your flyers around his building or neighborhood? Or if he stood up during some conversation or debate and said, “Blacks are animals”? [I think you mean “violent criminals are animals.”]
[Paragraph deleted. You came so close to not being a prick. So close.]
Well, I am delighted to see that MOONBATTERY has posted this story today!
Great stuff :)
[…] is coming unraveled in the city that gave us Barack Hussein Obama and much of his crew. But don’t be racist by noticing: Pardon the unintentional rhyme, but Chicago is under attack by packs of wild Blacks. (Paul Kersey […]
[…] Core Support Group Chicago Under Attack by Packs of Wild Blacks; Tribune: You're Racist for Noticing Black gangs consisting of more than a dozen perpetrators have been ambushing white pedestrians, […]
Thanks Mary. I’m glad to see the story’s getting around.
[U: Alright, the second insult-based debate that resulted from the now-closed first insult-based debate is now EQUALLY CLOSED.]
Who the fuck is saying that here? I’ve not seen anyone say that.
Wait, what? Fill me in.
[This site: http://www.moonbattery.com/]
time to reinstate slavery.
The smelly bug-eyed bum is at it again.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!
That’s cause basketball sucks. It’s always a crap shoot who is gonna win. They get FREE THROWS for crying out loud if someone BLOCKS the ball. Gee, I thought it was the FUCKINGGGGG JOB of the opposing team to STOP you from scoring. Except not in basketball. I’ve always hated it.
Soccer… now that’s a sport. Someone blocking every time.
Thanks for the link Unamused.
Aoirthoir, can you describe what it is that makes you not a rightist, or alternately, what distinguishes the rightists from the Aoirthoirists? I’m really curious for no reason.
Myself, I am a rightist because it is shorter than calling myself a pro-subsidiarity ethnopluralist distributist formalist heathen.
[…] is coming unraveled in the city that gave us Barack Hussein Obama and much of his crew. But don’t be racist by noticing: Pardon the unintentional rhyme, but Chicago is under attack by packs of wild Blacks. (Paul Kersey […]
The first step is to get white people to admit that they exist as white people. I know it sounds stupid, but your average white person simply will not admit that they are white, unless it is in a self-deprecating way (e.g., “Sorry, I’m white, we have no rhythm”). If pressed, they’ll say something like “There’s only one race — the human race” or “We’re all just shades of brown.” Such people cannot be expected to do anything positive. How can you help your people when you find the very idea that “your people” exists to be repugnant?
No, fuck that street fighting shit. The first thing to do is to create a white consciousness, and the best way to do that is through blogs, pamphlets, posts on comments pages, etc. We have to wear away the wall of self-denial and self-hatred that is holding back white consciousness. Once the majority of whites realize that white people exist, and that white people have the right to exist as white people, the hard work will have been done.
The best way to create white consciousness is by telling the truth. If we throw the reality of race relations in the faces of our fellow whites over and over again, if we show by word and deed that it’s okay to admit that black people as as a group dangerous to us, we will break down the resistance white people have to admitting that they are white and that white people have the right to exist as white people.
The worst thing we can do is to form some sort of street-fighting mob. The Powers That Be eat that shit up. They would love for us to don camouflage, pick up guns, and rush out to confront the black hordes. The footage of our “racist militia members” being marched in cuffs into the backs of SWAT wagons would be the best advertising in the world for them. “See? Anybody who’s against diversity is a fat, white Nazi gun nut!” Yeah, that’s gonna help.
Anybody that suggests street violence, terrorism, or violence in the name of white people or white rights is almost certainly a federal law enforcement agent.
No, we have to start from the bottom up. If we want white people to survive, we have to start by getting them to admit that they exist. Once they admit their own existence, we can take it from there. Someday, if we do our jobs well, we will have enough politicians, businessmen, and higher-ranking military officers on our side to overthrow the system in place. Until then, information warfare — the kind that can’t be stopped — is where we should be concentrating our efforts.
[U: Well said.]
Olave there are no Aoirthoirsts. Just an Aoirthoirist. As to the difference, lots and few. I’ve been accused of being a leftist, by both leftists and rightists. The Libertarians like to claim me as their own, and so do other groups. So whatever I am I let others define, they’re going to anyhow. So rather than saying the difference I will say what I believe.
I believe FACTS actually MATTER.
I believe in NOT blaming one person for ANOTHER’s actions.
I believe in OWNING UP to sh’t you have done.
I believe in speaking out against ACTUAL harms.
I believe in NOT CONFLATING something I don’t like with OPPRESSION.
I believe in abortion. I am NOT prochoice, I believe in ABORTION.
I believe in the Articles of Confederation and the constitution.
I believe slavery isn’t ACTUALLY illegal, nor does any amendment say it is.
I believe in the right to defend yourself AND the right NOT to if you decide.
I believe in SMALL government.
I believe in REPUBLICS and NOT democracy.
I do NOT believe that voting IS A RIGHT. It is a PRIVILEGE and MUST be earned.
I believe you have NO RIGHT to vote about sh’t you don’t actually KNOW about.
I believe I have NO right to vote about nuclear power plants and driling for oil in the gulf, since those are NOT my fields of expertise.
I believe that NO ONE has a right to vote another person’s property away from them.
I believe the Republicans and the Democrats are socialists.
I believe we are in a one party system that is doing everything it can to appear to be two party so that we don’t actually pay attention to whats going on.
I believe that my religion doesn’t get to make the rules, and neither should another’s.
You know, that kind of thing.
[…] News: Grass Still Green, Sky Still Blue, Blacks Still Less Intelligent Than Whites“, “Chicago Under Attack by Packs of Wild Blacks; Tribune: You’re Racist for Noticing“, “Black Mobs Attack White People; Tribune Editor: Race is Not a […]
[…] I covered Chicago’s wave of Black mob violence in early June, and how the media tried to justify censoring race. Mainly by shaming Whites for daring to notice Black people behaving badly, as it turns out. […]
Cultural marxism,destroyer of nations and manufacturer of the stupid.
[…] (June 8), by Dawn Turner Trice“Race and the ‘flash mob’ attacks” (June 8), by Steve ChapmanChicago bloggers or white victims of black violence who try to tell the truth are labelled racist by the Chicago […]
[…] Chicago bloggers or white victims of black violence who try to tell the truth are labelled racist by the Chicago Tribune newspaper. Via Moonbattery: “Pardon the unintentional rhyme, but Chicago is under attack by packs of wild Blacks. (That’s “groups of people who are (a) wild and (b) Black.” Go ahead, tell me it’s not an accurate description.) Paul Kersey is all over this. They’re storming buses 15 at a time, beating White people with bottles and robbing them (NBC Chicago, June 8). Gangs of 15 or 20 are ambushing White pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as one visiting Japanese oncologist (CBS Chicago, June 5 and June 6; Chicago Tribune, June 6). Smaller groups are using pepper spray to disable their victims (CBS Chicago, June 3 and June 5). Contrary to media reports, the problem isn’t “teens” or “youths” or “kids” or “people.” […]